How test coverage sustains analytical quality and strengthens laboratory technical management.
Organized processes are essential for performing tests, but on their own they do not guarantee analytical quality. Quality is only demonstrated when results are supported by continuous monitoring and independent external validation, such as Proficiency Testing, also known as External Quality Assessment.
While Internal Quality Control monitors the stability of routine performance over time, External Quality Assessment independently demonstrates the laboratory’s performance against recognized standards. Depending on the area, mechanisms such as the use of Reference Strains and Certified Reference Materials also apply. Without these controls, there is no objective evidence of analytical quality.
What defines analytical coverage
It is the presence of these controls that defines analytical coverage. It shows in how many and in which tests internal and external quality controls are effectively implemented. Where they exist, there is evidence of quality. Where they do not, there is a technical gap that compromises the safety of results.
When these controls are present across the entire portfolio, coverage is consolidated. When they are applied to only part of the tests, the laboratory operates with partial coverage, meaning different levels of analytical safety within the same system.
In practical terms:
- the process organizes test execution;
- internal quality control monitors routine performance;
- external quality assessment validates performance;
- coverage shows how far these elements are present across the portfolio.
Without internal and external quality control, there is execution, but no sustained quality.
The direct impact on technical management
Partial coverage creates asymmetries in the quality system, makes it harder to provide evidence during audits, weakens standardization, and increases exposure to technical and regulatory risks. A structured process ensures execution, but only coverage guarantees consistent monitoring and validation across the entire portfolio.
From a business perspective, operating with different levels of analytical safety undermines confidence in results and increases exposure to risks that directly affect reputation and the robustness of quality management.
Expanding coverage strengthens quality
Expanding coverage means ensuring that all tests follow the same monitoring and validation criteria. This strengthens analytical reliability, reduces risks, and demonstrates the maturity of the quality system.
Complete coverage as a sign of technical maturity
Complete coverage supports audits, reinforces regulatory compliance, and consolidates confidence in results. More than a differentiator, it becomes the foundation of the laboratory’s analytical quality.
In this context, having experienced partners in quality control programs makes a difference. For nearly 50 years, Controllab has worked alongside laboratories in various fields, offering Proficiency Testing programs and solutions that support the development of solid, technical analytical coverage aligned with regulatory requirements.
Talk to a Controllab specialist and evaluate how to expand the coverage of your tests in a technical, safe, and fully compliant manner.