Laboratory Performance in the Molecular Detection of High-Risk and Low-Risk HPV: High-Risk Assays Outperform Low-Risk Assays

Laboratory Performance in the Molecular Detection of High-Risk and Low-Risk HPV: High-Risk Assays Outperform Low-Risk Assays

Introduction - Aim

HPV detection is a global health priority. High-risk HPV (HR-HPV) is one of the primary causes of cervical cancer, while low-risk HPV (LR-HPV) is associated with benign lesions, such as genital warts. Reliable HPV testing requires standardized laboratory performance, and External Quality Assessment (EQA) Programs play a vital role in ensuring accuracy and harmonization. This study compared laboratory performance in an EQA program for the molecular detection of HR-HPV and LR-HPV by PCR/qPCR, organized by a provider accredited according to ABNT NBR ISO/IEC 17043:2011.

Methods

Liquid samples from cervical brushing or cell lysate were utilized in the EQAP. Between 2020 and 2024, laboratories received two quarterly samples to evaluate accuracy (AC), sensitivity (SE), and specificity (SP). These performance metrics were assessed and compared between the High-risk and Low-risk HPV PCR/qPCR using chi-square tests and odds ratios. HR-HPV and LR-HPV AC trends over time were analyzed using the Mann-Kendall test.

Results

69 laboratories (median 18 laboratories/round, range 5–51; 692 datasets) participated in the HR-HPV evaluation, and 34 laboratories (median 12 laboratories/round, range 2–26; 386 datasets) in the LR-HPV evaluation. HR-HPV results were 97.98% (678/692) AC, 97.79% (620/634) SE, and 100% (58/58) SP, while LR-HPV achieved 94.82% (366/386) AC, 93.84% (259/276) SE, and 97.27% (107/110) SP. Significant differences in SE (OR=2.91, 95% CI: 1.41–5.98, p=0.0048) and AC (OR=2.62, 95% CI: 1.32–5.19, p=0.0077) favored HR-HPV, while SP was comparable (OR=3.81, 95% CI: 0.19–75.02, p=0.5116) (Table 1). No significant trends in AC were observed over time for High-risk HPV testing (τ=-0.046, p=0.795) or Low-risk HPV testing (τ=0.3, p=0.098).

Desempenho da participação no programa HR-HPV versus o programa LR-HPV - Tabela 1
Table 1: Performance of participation in the HR-HPV program versus the LR-HPV program

Conclusions

Both evaluations demonstrated strong performance, with HR-HPV showing better sensitivity and accuracy, while specificity was similar. No significant trends in accuracy were observed over time, indicating stability with no changes over time. Detecting LR-HPV remains crucial for managing lesions, enabling cost-effective treatment, reducing transmission, and supporting public health strategies. This study highlights that LR-HPV PCR/qPCR assays have room for improvement to meet HR-HPV standards, emphasizing the need for ongoing refinement and quality assessments.

References

WHO guideline for screening and treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions for cervical cancer prevention, second edition:Use of mRNA tests for human papillomavirus (HPV)-World Health Organization 2021.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) to screen for cervical pre-cancer lesions and prevent cervical cancer: policy brief-World Health Organization 2022.

Okada PA, Mitrat S, Rojanawiwat A. External quality assessment program for human papillomaviruses DNA testing in Thailand. Pract Lab Med. 2023 Dec 26; 38: e00352. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm. 2023. e00352. PMID: 38292923; PMCID: PMC10825476.

Authors:

G. Barra4, A. Vieira1, L. Vasconcellos2, Á. Pulchinelli3, S. Lima1, C. Bastos1, F. Drummond1, V. Dias1, J. Oliveira1, J. Poloni1, V. Biasoli1

1 – Controllab, Rio de Janeiro – Brasil.

2 – Faculdade de Medicina – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte – Brasil; Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica/Medicina Laboratorial (SBPC/ML), Rio de Janeiro – Brasil.

3 – Grupo Fleury, São Paulo – Brasil; Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica/Medicina Laboratorial (SBPC/ML), Rio de Janeiro – Brasil.

4 – Sabin diagnóstico e saúde, Brasília, Brasil.

See also

Sign up for our newsletter

Receive relevant publications about lab and solutions for
quality management.

plugins premium WordPress
X
We use cookies and other similar technologies to improve your experience, enabling a more personalized navigation, according to the characteristics and your interest. For more information see our Privacy and Security Policy.

PRM 0009

Certified Reference Material Producer

Accredited by Coordenação-Geral de Acreditação do Inmetro

Controllab has been accredited as a Certified Reference Material (CRM) Producer since 2016 by Cgcre, under number PMR 0009. The conformity assessment is carried out in accordance with the requirements established in ABNT NBR ISO 17034 and Inmetro standards, ensuring competence for the production of CRMs, as defined in the Scope of Accreditation.

This accreditation attests to Controllab’s technical competence in producing CRMs according to international requirements and enables it to be recognized in other countries, under mutual recognition agreements, thereby reducing technical barriers between Brazil and other countries across continents.

Materiais de Referência Certificados - PMR 0009 - ABNT NBR ISO 17034-Controllab
Cgcre is signatory to the Mutual Recognition Arrangements of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) and Interamerican Accreditation Cooperation (IAAC).

CAL 0214

Calibration Laboratory

Accredited by Coordenação-Geral de Acreditação do Inmetro

In December 2002, the Calibration Laboratory was accredited by Cgcre. With this recognition, it became part of the Brazilian network of accredited laboratories, under number 214. Since then, it has been periodically evaluated for the maintenance and/or extension of its accreditation.

The Inmetro seal attests to Controllab’s technical competence, credibility, and operational capability for calibration services, in accordance with the requirements of ABNT NBR ISO/IEC 17025.

Calibração de Instrumentos - CAL 0214 - ABNT NBR ISO/IEC 17025 - Controllab
Cgcre is signatory to the Mutual Recognition Arrangements of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) and Interamerican Accreditation Cooperation (IAAC).

PEP 0003

Proficiency Test Provider

Accredited by Coordenação-Geral de Acreditação do Inmetro

In September 2011, Controllab was accredited by Cgcre as a proficiency test provider, under nº PEP0003. Initially as part of a pilot project by Inmetro, this accreditation was based on ILAC G13: 2007 and included several clinical and hemotherapy tests. In the periodic evaluations of this accreditation, new segments and tests are included and the evaluation is now conducted according to ABNT NBR ISO/IEC 17043.

This accreditation attests to Controllab’s technical competence to develop and conduct proficiency tests in accordance with international requirements and enables it to be recognized in other countries, in accordance with mutual recognition agreements signed by Brazil in Mercosur, the Americas and Europe.

PEP 0003 - ABNT NBR ISO-IEC 17043 - Controllab

Cgcre is signatory to the Mutual Recognition Arrangements of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) and Interamerican Accreditation Cooperation (IAAC).